ArticleIndian journal of psychiatry2025
A case-control study on QEEG as a marker of cognition in depression.
Article in Indian journal of psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Quantitative electroencephalography (QEEG) has emerged as an inexpensive electrophysiological testing modality versus other neuroimaging techniques such as functional magnetic resonance imaging for the identification of early cognitive changes related to electrical abnormalities and network dysfunctions. QEEG and cognitive measures have been extensively used in understanding physiological changes in the brain occurring in individuals with certain illnesses; however, studies ascertaining the relationship between QEEG and cognitive functions are scarce. Aim: To explore the relationship between QEEG and the cognitive status of patients with depression. Methods: The case group included individuals diagnosed with depressive disorder (MINI 7.0.2), whereas the control group comprised subjects without psychiatric illnesses (12-Item General Health Questionnaire, score ≤2). Cognition was assessed using ACE III (Hindi), and electroencephalograms were recorded in an alert, awake state in individuals in both case and control groups. Results: Forty-five age- and gender-matched (age ± 2 years, males = 29) subjects with depression (mean ± SD = 61.13 ± 10.634) and controls (mean ± SD = 60.51 ± 10.78) were recruited. In the case group, significant associations were seen in areas F3 theta with memory; F4 alpha with attention, memory, language, and visuospatial domains; and P4 delta with language and visuospatial domains. Conclusion: The activity of theta, alpha, and delta waves was significantly different between groups, suggesting their role in cognition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.