Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40655999›Full record

ArticleForensic science international. Synergy2025

Verification of intimate and non-intimate recovery of DNA within Sexual Assault Referral Centres (SARCs).

Michelle Gaskell, June Guiness, Amy Hamm, Guylaine O Hanford, Abi Marshall, Kevin Sullivan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Forensic science international. Synergy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Michelle GaskellForensic Capability Network, UK.
June GuinessOffice of the Forensic Science Regulator, UK.
Amy HammG4S Health Services Limited, UK.
Guylaine O HanfordForensic Capability Network, UK.
Abi MarshallG4S Health Services Limited, UK.
Kevin SullivanForensic Capability Network, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper describes the verification of DNA recovery processes undertaken in forensic medical examination facilities within Sexual Assault Referral Centres (SARCs) across England and Wales in the investigation of rape and sexual assault. This is in support of a national initiative for SARCs to provide additional quality assurances regarding forensic integrity. This is achieved through compliance with the Forensic Science Regulator (FSR) Code of Practice including accreditation to ISO 15189

Indexed as

DNA contaminationDNA recoveryForensic medical examinationIntimate DNA recoverySexual Assault Reference Centre (SARC)Verification

Identifiers

PMID40655999
PMCPMC12246716

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.