ArticleFrontiers in oral health2025
Lingual nerve injuries: recognized complications or preventable errors?
Article in Frontiers in oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Diagnostic re-evaluation of non-odontogenic orofacial pain after treatment failure: a retrospective case series.Journal of oral & facial pain and headache · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lingual nerve injuries (LNIs) represent a significant clinical challenge that can compromise speech, taste perception, and overall patient well-being. These may occur during third molar extractions, inferior alveolar nerve blocks, implant placement, root canal treatment and other dental, oral, and maxillofacial procedures. A major controversy centers on whether LNIs should be regarded as recognized complications-unavoidable events despite competent care-or potential negligence arising from substandard practice. Such classification hinges on factors including adherence to standard surgical protocols, informed consent, and timely postoperative assessment. Early detection using both qualitative and quantitative sensory evaluations allow prompt referral for microsurgical intervention, potentially improving outcomes if repairs are done within six months of injury. Conversely, lapses in diagnosis or management can lead to enduring disability, increased legal risk, and allegations of negligence. Evolving guidelines and advances in imaging and artificial intelligence may ultimately refine risk assessments, reduce complications, and alter standards of care. By recognizing the multifactorial nature of LNIs and adhering to rigorous surgical protocols, continuing education, and thorough documentation, healthcare professionals can optimize patient safety and potentially mitigate medico-legal challenges and enhance patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.