Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40655933›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oral health2025

Lingual nerve injuries: recognized complications or preventable errors?

Frederic Van der Cruyssen, Robin Willaert, Michael Miloro

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Frederic Van der CruyssenDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Robin WillaertDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Michael MiloroDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lingual nerve injuries (LNIs) represent a significant clinical challenge that can compromise speech, taste perception, and overall patient well-being. These may occur during third molar extractions, inferior alveolar nerve blocks, implant placement, root canal treatment and other dental, oral, and maxillofacial procedures. A major controversy centers on whether LNIs should be regarded as recognized complications-unavoidable events despite competent care-or potential negligence arising from substandard practice. Such classification hinges on factors including adherence to standard surgical protocols, informed consent, and timely postoperative assessment. Early detection using both qualitative and quantitative sensory evaluations allow prompt referral for microsurgical intervention, potentially improving outcomes if repairs are done within six months of injury. Conversely, lapses in diagnosis or management can lead to enduring disability, increased legal risk, and allegations of negligence. Evolving guidelines and advances in imaging and artificial intelligence may ultimately refine risk assessments, reduce complications, and alter standards of care. By recognizing the multifactorial nature of LNIs and adhering to rigorous surgical protocols, continuing education, and thorough documentation, healthcare professionals can optimize patient safety and potentially mitigate medico-legal challenges and enhance patient outcomes.

Indexed as

complicationerrorlegallingual nerve injuriesperspective

Identifiers

PMID40655933
PMCPMC12245760

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.