Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40655929›Full record

ReviewCurrent addiction reports2025

Cravings, Control, and Cessation: A Scoping Review of Perceptions of Nicotine Addiction.

Allison A Temourian, Deanna M Halliday, Anna V Song

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current addiction reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Allison A TemourianCenter for Tobacco Control Research and Education, University of California, San Francisco, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3994-6648
Deanna M HallidayCenter for Tobacco Control Research and Education, University of California, San Francisco, USA.
Anna V SongNicotine and Cannabis Policy Center, University of California, Merced, USA.

Funding

Postdoctoral training in tobacco controlT32DA057216 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Dorothy Elinor Apollonio, Pamela May Ling · 2023 to 2026
$2.0M
NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA057216
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose of Review: Nicotine addiction is the result of repeated tobacco use and subsequently promotes continued consumption, potentially acting as both cause and consequence of tobacco use. This scoping review aims to describe the literature and catalogue existing measures regarding perceptions of nicotine addiction with special attention to scales that recognize its multidimensionality. Recent Findings: Following a comprehensive review of 923 empirical articles, we found 252 articles that assessed perceptions of nicotine addiction, five of which utilized a validated measure. Single item assessments were categorized into affective concern, knowledge that tobacco is addictive, personal perceptions of addiction, other people's addiction, and comparative addictiveness. Scaled measures of perceptions of nicotine addiction largely assessed perceived susceptibility and severity. Summary: Despite decades of research demonstrating the importance of perceptions of risk and expectancies in risk-behavior decision-making, tools and items assessing perceptions of nicotine addiction are highly varied and do not account for the multidimensionality of nicotine addiction. We, as a field, lack a comprehensive assessment of perceptions of nicotine addiction that integrates the complexity of addiction into an individual's appraisal of risk, which is a critical component of prevention and intervention-based research. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40429-025-00673-4.

Indexed as

AddictionNicotinePerceptions of addictionTobacco

Identifiers

PMID40655929
PMCPMC12254085

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.