ReviewJournal of mood and anxiety disorders2024
Heteronormative and cisnormative stereotypes in commonly-used social anxiety scales: A scoping review.
Review in Journal of mood and anxiety disorders, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Long-term follow-up study of low-weight avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder and childhood-onset anorexia nervosa: comparison of autistic eating behaviours.Journal of eating disorders · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Social anxiety is a common, but under-researched topic in the LGBTQIA+ community. We conducted a scoping review of studies between January 2014 and April 2024 that included LGBTQIA+ samples with social anxiety scales evaluating scales for outdated language. The search produced 1155 results out of which 17 articles fit the inclusion criteria. The results suggest that 47 % of the measures include items that reinforce heteronormative or cisnormative stereotypes and 29.4 % of studies included scales inappropriate for the population under investigation. Therefore, the wordings of certain items need to be adapted to fit the investigated population and a re-examination of the psychometric properties of the revised scales is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.