ArticleJournal of mood and anxiety disorders2024
Predicting OCD severity from religiosity and personality: A machine learning and neural network approach.
Article in Journal of mood and anxiety disorders, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Classifying Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder from Resting-State EEG Using Convolutional Neural Networks: A Pilot Study.Computational psychiatry (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2026Article
- Classifying Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder from Resting-State EEG using Convolutional Neural Networks: A Pilot Study.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- Precision Psychiatry for Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: Clinical Applications of Deep Learning Architectures.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Deep learning in obsessive-compulsive disorder: a narrative review.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) affects a significant portion of the United States population. The present study investigated the complex relationships among OCD severity, personality traits, religiosity, and spirituality with a dataset of 229 participants. We applied advanced machine and deep learning techniques to identify key predictors of OCD severity, uncovering nuanced relationships and unexpected findings. Notably, item-level features were more influential than aggregate scores, challenging traditional analytical approaches. Moreover, a neural network model, despite not surpassing a linear regression in predictive accuracy, provided a more comprehensive understanding of OCD's heterogeneity and of the nonlinear relationships between our variables. The inclusion of demographic factors provided further explanatory power for predicting OCD severity, emphasizing the multifaceted nature of the disorder. Our results show that machine learning models can nearly match traditional linear models in predictive power while retaining nonlinear relationships essential to understanding OCD. Our study advocates for the adoption of sophisticated predictive models in examining complex psychological phenomena, encouraging a reevaluation of conventional analytical approaches when prediction is central to research questions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.