ArticleDental research journal2025
The impact of airflow on enamel surface roughness and color change.
Article in Dental research journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In dentistry, esthetic restorations are vital. Adequate polishing can minimize color changes of a tooth. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of the Prophy-Mate neo device, which uses airflow, on surface roughness and color changes in enamel. Materials and Methods: In this Results: The variation in surface roughness (Ra) between calcium carbonate (0.381 μm) and sodium bicarbonate (0.447 μm) powders was not significant, but the performance of diamond paste was significantly better. The difference between the secondary staining after polishing was lower than the pigment absorption in the primary staining (before polishing) in the diamond paste group. Conclusion: Overall, the study did not show any significant reduction in the amount of surface roughness and color changes in airflow compared to traditional polishing methods. The cost and services of the Prophy-Mate neo device make it challenging to introduce airflow as an alternative to conventional techniques (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.