Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40655842›Full record

ArticleJournal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences2025

Development of AI-Enhanced Smile Design Software for Ultra-Customized Aesthetic Outcomes.

Lamia Mohsin, Najd Alenezi, Yara Rashdan, Aldana Hassan, Muneera Alenezi, Mohammad Khursheed Alam, Nor Farid Bin Mohd Noor, Fatema Akhter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Perception of Orofacial Esthetics Using a Scan-Free Virtual Video Mock-Up: A Comparative Analysis of Self-Evaluation Versus Unknown-People Assessment.Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.] · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Lamia MohsinIntern, College of Medicine and Dentistry, Riyadh Elm University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Najd AleneziIntern, College of Medicine and Dentistry, Riyadh Elm University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Yara RashdanIntern, College of Medicine and Dentistry, Riyadh Elm University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Aldana HassanIntern, College of Medicine and Dentistry, Riyadh Elm University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Muneera AleneziIntern, College of Medicine and Dentistry, Riyadh Elm University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Mohammad Khursheed AlamPreventive Dentistry Department, College of Dentistry, Jouf University, Sakaka, Saudi Arabia.
Nor Farid Bin Mohd NoorDepartment of Anatomy and Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin (UniSZA), Medical Campus, Jalan Sultan Mahmud, Kuala Terengganu, Terengganu Darul Iman, Malaysia.
Fatema AkhterDepartment of Surgical and Diagnostic Sciences, College of Dentistry, Dar Al Uloom University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) have paved the way for ultra-customized aesthetic solutions in dentistry, particularly in smile design. Conventional smile design methods often fall short in providing a fully personalized outcome, necessitating the development of AI-enhanced software to optimize results by considering facial features, dental parameters, and patient preferences. Materials and Methods: A prototype AI-enhanced smile design software was developed using a combination of convolutional neural networks for facial analysis and generative adversarial networks for creating customized smile designs. The study involved 50 participants, each undergoing facial feature scanning, digital dental impressions, and patient-specific aesthetic input collection. The software's performance was evaluated based on user satisfaction, aesthetic quality, and procedural efficiency. A comparison was made with conventional smile design methods to assess improvements in outcomes. Results: The AI-enhanced software demonstrated significant improvements in aesthetic outcomes and efficiency. The mean patient satisfaction score was 9.2/10 compared to 7.5/10 with conventional methods. Aesthetic quality was rated higher by experts (mean score: 8.8/10 vs. 7.3/10), and the time required for smile design reduced by 40%. The integration of AI allowed for more precise customization, aligning with patient preferences and anatomical considerations. Conclusion: The development of AI-enhanced smile design software represents a significant step toward achieving ultra-customized aesthetic outcomes in dentistry. By integrating advanced facial analysis and design algorithms, the software offers a superior alternative to conventional methods, promising enhanced satisfaction, efficiency, and aesthetic precision.

Indexed as

Aesthetic dentistryartificial intelligencecustomized dental solutionsdental software developmentgenerative adversarial networkssmile design

Identifiers

PMID40655842
PMCPMC12244612

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.