ArticleJournal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences2025
Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Various Chairside Reline Materials to 3D Printed Provisional Crown Resins Following Surface Treatment.
Article in Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The reline material and interim base should bond well in provisional restorations. Few research examined 3D-printed restoration-relining bonding. To test the shear bond strength (SBS) of chairside crown reline materials to microfilled hybrid 3D-printed resin (PR) utilizing different surface treatments and materials. Methods and Materials: Three-dimensionally printed 360 provisional samples were divided into six groups based on surface treatment (monomer, 5% hydrofluoric acid, monomer and 5% hydrofluoric acid, monomer and 110 μm aluminum oxide, and control groups) and subgroups based on relining material (flowable composite resin, bis-acrylic, and poly methyl methacrylate). A universal testing device determined the bonded samples' SBS. Results: The group that received hydrofluoric acid and air abrasion surface treatment and was relined with flowable composite had a significantly higher SBS value than the other groups. On the other hand, the group that received hydrofluoric acid and was relined with flowable composite had a significantly lower SBS value. Conclusion: Bis-acryl resin outperforms 3D-PR in SBS. Surface preparation for 3D-printed provisional restorations should include hydrofluoric acid and air abrasion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.