Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40655806›Full record

ArticleJournal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences2025

A Scanning Electron Microscopic Study Comparing the Marginal Adaptation of Different Bulk Fill Composites in a Class II Cavity.

J Pooraninagalakshmi, Prasanna Latha Nadig, K B Jayalakshmi, Janani Balachandran, Muralidasan Kalaivani, Suresh Mitthra

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

J PooraninagalakshmiDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Sree Balaji Dental College and Hospital, Bharath Institute of Higher Education and Research, Pallikaranai, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Prasanna Latha NadigDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Krishnadevaraya College of Dental Sciences, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
K B JayalakshmiDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Krishnadevaraya College of Dental Sciences, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Janani BalachandranDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Sree Balaji Dental College and Hospital, Bharath Institute of Higher Education and Research, Pallikaranai, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Muralidasan KalaivaniDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Sree Balaji Dental College and Hospital, Bharath Institute of Higher Education and Research, Pallikaranai, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Suresh MitthraDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, SRM Kattankulathur Dental College and Hospital, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, SRM Nagar, Potheri, Tamil Nadu, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim: To compare marginal adaptation of bulkfill low shrinkage composite in a class II cavity under scanning electron microscope. Materials and Methods: 52 extracted human molars were stored in the saline. Class II cavities were prepared extending 1mm below CEJ. The teeth were randomly assigned to 4 groups ( Results: Marginal adaptation seen in both SDR and sonicfill was better when compared to Tetric N Ceram and Filtek bulk fill and also all four experimental groups showed better enamel adaptation when compared to the adaptation in the cementum.

Indexed as

Bulkfill compositesmarginal adaptationSDRsonicfill technology

Identifiers

PMID40655806
PMCPMC12244706

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.