ArticleJournal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences2025
An
Article in Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA) is widely used in endodontics due to its biocompatibility and sealing properties. The gel form of MTA has been introduced to enhance handling and adaptation characteristics. Objective: This study aims to compare the sealing ability and adaptation of the gel form of MTA to dentinal walls using an Materials and Methods: The study involved 25 extracted human premolar teeth, divided into three groups: MTA gel form, conventional MTA, and control (no MTA). Sealing ability was assessed through dye penetration analysis, and adaptation was evaluated using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Results: The gel form of MTA exhibited superior sealing ability and adaptation compared to conventional MTA and control groups. Statistical analysis (ANOVA, Conclusion: MTA in gel form demonstrated improved sealing ability and adaptation to dentinal walls, suggesting its potential as an effective endodontic material.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.