ArticleJournal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences2025
Evaluation of Postendodontic Pain Using Multiple and Single Rotary File Systems in Single-Visit Endodontics - A Comparative Study.
Article in Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Postendodontic pain is a common concern following root canal treatment. The rotary file system used during the procedure significantly influences this pain. Materials and Methods: A total of 60 patients requiring single-visit root canal treatment on single-rooted teeth were divided into two groups: group A (n = 30) treated using multiple rotary file systems, and group B (n = 30) treated using a single rotary file system. Postendodontic pain was assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS) at 6, 24, and 48 hours post-treatment. Statistical analysis was performed using the Chi-square test and independent Results: At 6 hours, group A reported a mean VAS score of 4.2 ± 0.8, while group B reported 3.1 ± 0.7 ( Conclusion: Single rotary file systems result in significantly less postendodontic pain compared to multiple rotary file systems in single-visit endodontics. These findings suggest that the single rotary file system may be preferable for reducing patient discomfort during the early postoperative period.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.