Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40655748›Full record

ArticleJournal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences2025

A Retrospective Comparative Study of Nerve-Stimulator Versus Ultrasound-Guided Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block.

Bhumika Ashvin Raval, Iramnaaz A Shaikh, Nirupama A Sunasara, Nandita A Sunsara

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Bhumika Ashvin RavalAssistant Professor, Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Smt. G. R. Doshi and Smt. K. M. Mehta Institute of Kidney Diseases and Research Centre, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.
Iramnaaz A ShaikhAssistant Professor, Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Smt. G. R. Doshi and Smt. K. M. Mehta Institute of Kidney Diseases and Research Centre, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.
Nirupama A SunasaraFreelancing Consultant Anaesthesiologist at Jayaben Modi Hospital, Ankleshwar, Gujarat, India.
Nandita A SunsaraDepartment of Cardiology, G. N. M. Nursing, Saint Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Regional blocks are the preferred choice in procedures like arteriovenous fistula (AVF) creation involving the wrist or cubital fossa in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients. We compared ultrasonography versus peripheral nerve stimulator-guided supraclavicular block to identify the non-inferior technique in these patients. Materials and Methods: This retrospective cohort analysis included 60 ESRD patients at the largest tertiary medical care centre of its kind in the world. Of these, 30 received the ultrasound-guided supraclavicular block (Group US), while the other 30 received it with the peripheral nerve stimulator technique (Group NS). Statistical analysis was done using GraphPad PRISM 10.0.0 software. Results: A significant difference was noted in the block execution time, onset and duration of sensory and motor block, and time to achieve a complete block in both groups. Conclusion: Ultrasound with nerve stimulator appears to be the technique of choice in ESRD patients.

Indexed as

Arteriovenous-fistulaperipheral nerve stimulatorsupraclavicular blockultrasonography

Identifiers

PMID40655748
PMCPMC12244679

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.