ArticleJournal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences2025
Maternal Outcomes Following Emergency Cesarean Delivery: Evaluating the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocol in a Randomized Controlled Trial.
Article in Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reducing postoperative length of stay in low-risk caesarean section: a system-level quality improvement initiative.BMJ open quality · 2026Article
- Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols: Impact on patient outcomes.Bioinformation · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: To evaluate the impact of the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol on maternal outcomes following emergency cesarean delivery (CD). Materials and Methods: The study was conducted at ACS Medical College and Hospital, Chennai, from September 2023 to September 2024. A total of 100 participants undergoing emergency cesarean deliveries were randomly assigned to either the ERAS group or the control group. Statistical analysis was assessed using an Independent Results: Women in the ERAS group had a significantly shorter hospital stay (and higher maternal satisfaction). Postoperative complications were fewer in the ERAS group. Pain scores were lower at 6, 12, and 24 h post-surgery in the ERAS group when compared to the control group. The ERAS group also had faster bowel function recovery and earlier breastfeeding initiation. Conclusion: The ERAS protocol significantly improves maternal outcomes following emergency CD, including faster recovery, reduced pain, and improved maternal satisfaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.