ArticleJournal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences2025
The Influence of Implant Placement Angulation on Biomechanical Stability
Article in Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Influence of Reduced Cortical Bone Compression by Implant Macrogeometry on Peri-Implant Bone Healing: An In Vitro and In Vivo Experimental Study.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The angulation of dental implants significantly impacts their biomechanical stability, which plays a crucial role in the long-term success of implant therapy. This study aims to evaluate the influence of different implant angulations on primary stability through an Materials and Methods: In this Results: The mean insertion torque values were 45 Ncm, 35 Ncm, and 25 Ncm for Groups A, B, and C, respectively. ISQ values at the time of placement were highest in Group A (75 ± 2), followed by Group B (68 ± 3) and Group C (60 ± 5). After cyclic loading, ISQ values decreased across all groups but remained significantly higher in Group A (73 ± 2) compared to Group B (65 ± 4) and Group C (57 ± 6). The statistical analysis revealed a significant difference ( Conclusion: The findings of this
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.