ArticleJournal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences2025
Article in Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of low-level laser therapy's effectiveness in reducing pain and bone loss around dental implants.Bioinformation · 2025Article
- Osseodensification over standard drilling methods on implant stability and crestal bone level.Bioinformation · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Implant abutment materials significantly influence peri-implant tissue health, particularly the attachment and behavior of gingival fibroblasts. An optimal material can enhance biocompatibility and reduce inflammation, ensuring long-term success. This study compares the effects of titanium, zirconia, and polyetheretherketone (PEEK) abutments on gingival fibroblast attachment Materials and Methods: Standardized disks of titanium, zirconia, and PEEK abutment materials were prepared. Primary gingival fibroblasts were cultured and seeded on the disks in a 24-well plate format, with each material in triplicate. Cell attachment was assessed after 24 and 48 hours using fluorescence microscopy and a quantitative cell adhesion assay. Surface roughness (Ra) and hydrophilicity of the disks were evaluated to correlate with fibroblast behavior. Arbitrary values for attached cell counts and surface characteristics were analyzed using ANOVA and Results: Titanium demonstrated the highest fibroblast attachment (mean cell count: 1.25 × 10 Conclusion: Titanium and zirconia provide favorable conditions for gingival fibroblast attachment, with titanium slightly outperforming zirconia due to superior surface properties. PEEK, while biocompatible, demonstrates reduced fibroblast attachment, suggesting limited suitability for areas requiring strong soft tissue integration. These findings underscore the importance of material selection in achieving optimal peri-implant tissue health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.