ArticleJournal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences2025
To Study the Effectiveness of Using Suture Passer in Sacrospinous Vault Fixation Surgery.
Article in Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a prevalent condition characterized by the descent of pelvic organs due to the weakening of connective tissue and muscles. Sacrospinous ligament fixation (SSLF) is an established surgical technique for managing apical prolapse. This study evaluates the effectiveness of using a suture passer device in SSLF to enhance surgical outcomes. Materials and Methods: This prospective study was conducted in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, MGM Medical College, over 1 year, including 50 patients with vault prolapse or stage 3 and 4 POP. Patients underwent vaginal hysterectomy with sacrospinous vault fixation or sacrospinous vault fixation alone. Parameters assessed included operative time, complications, and postoperative pain levels measured using a numerical pain scale. Results: The mean operative time was 9.88 ± 3.61 minutes. Postoperative pain levels significantly decreased over time, with mean scores of 3.80 ± 0.70 on day 1, 1.84 ± 0.79 on day 7, and 0.09 ± 0.29 at 6 months ( Conclusion: Using a suture passer in SSLF is an effective technique for managing apical prolapse, offering reduced operative time, minimal complications, and significant postoperative pain relief. This method demonstrates promise in improving surgical efficiency and patient outcomes in prolapse management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.