ArticleJournal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences2025
Motivational Strategies for Neurological Rehabilitation.
Article in Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Neurological rehabilitation programs rely on motivational strategies to enhance patient engagement and adherence. However, the specific techniques utilized and their impact remain understudied. Objective: This study aimed to identify the motivational strategies used within neurological rehabilitation programs, evaluate the purpose of using them, and determine the information considered while selecting these strategies. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 250 rehabilitation professionals. Data on demographic details, motivational strategies used, and factors influencing their selection were collected and analyzed. Results: Among the participants, 34.8% were male, and 65.2% were female. The most frequently used motivational strategy was active listening (94.4%). The primary reason for selecting a motivational strategy was cognitive function (13.9%). Statistical analysis revealed no significant difference in the number of strategies used based on clinical experience ( Conclusion: Active listening emerged as the most widely employed motivational strategy, while cognitive function played a crucial role in strategy selection. No significant variations were observed in the number of strategies used across different levels of clinical experience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.