ArticleJournal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences2025
Article in Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bone Compatibility of Experimental Ti-Ag and Ti-Cu Alloy Dental Implants in a Beagle Dog Model.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Article
- Osseointegration of implant with various surface treatments.Bioinformation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Osseointegration is a critical factor determining the success of dental implants. Various surface treatments are applied to enhance the integration of implants with the surrounding bone tissue. Materials and Methods: Standardized dental implants were divided into four groups based on the surface treatment applied: Group A (machined surface), Group B (sandblasted and acid-etched), Group C (plasma-sprayed hydroxyapatite coating), and Group D (titanium oxide nano-coating). Implants were embedded in bovine bone blocks and subjected to biomechanical testing after a simulated healing period of 8 weeks under controlled conditions. Parameters assessed included bone-implant contact (BIC) percentage and pull-out strength (N). Results: Group A exhibited the lowest BIC percentage (45%) and pull-out strength (150 N). Group B demonstrated a significant improvement with a BIC of 65% and pull-out strength of 210 N. Group C achieved a BIC of 75% and pull-out strength of 250 N. Group D showed the highest values, with a BIC of 85% and pull-out strength of 300 N. Statistical analysis revealed that Groups C and D performed significantly better ( Conclusion: Surface treatments significantly influence the osseointegration of dental implants. Titanium oxide nano-coating and plasma-sprayed hydroxyapatite coatings demonstrated superior results, suggesting their potential as preferred surface modification techniques for enhancing implant success. Further clinical studies are recommended to validate these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.