Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40655621›Full record

ArticleJournal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences2025

Finesse in Maxillofacial Reconstruction: Miniplates Supported Fibula Free Flaps for Enhanced Outcomes- A Report of Two Clinical Cases.

Elengkumaran Sankaran, Debothiri Basu, Preetha Parthasarathy, Ronisa Swain, Ravindran Chinnasamy

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Elengkumaran SankaranDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Sri Ramachandra Dental College and Hospital, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research, Porur, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Debothiri BasuDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Sri Ramachandra Dental College and Hospital, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research, Porur, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Preetha ParthasarathyDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Sri Ramachandra Dental College and Hospital, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research, Porur, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Ronisa SwainDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Sri Ramachandra Dental College and Hospital, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research, Porur, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Ravindran ChinnasamyDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Sri Ramachandra Dental College and Hospital, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research, Porur, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Maxillofacial reconstruction using the archetypical free fibula flap (FFF) can be accomplished utilizing diversified plating techniques. The mini plates and the reconstruction plates or bars exhibit unique characteristics that render them potential advantages, although accompanied by a tolerable measure of disadvantages with respect to successful fixation, favorable clinical outcomes, patient comfort, recovery period, as well as early and late post-operative complications. Although there is substantial evidence on the mechanobiological role of the fixation units in the literature, only sparse data is available that compares the complication profiles of mini plates versus reconstruction bars for a stable fixation during segmental reconstructive procedures. We report here, two cases of highly successful and complication-free maxillary and mandibular reconstructions executed with mini plates as fixation units for the FFF. The intra-operative ease and favorable healing periods observed in both patients exemplify the potential advantages of mini plates as a primary fixation modality in osseous flap reconstructions, underscoring their viability as a preferred alternative to reconstruction bars in select clinical scenarios.

Indexed as

Fibula flapmaxillofacial reconstructionmini plates

Identifiers

PMID40655621
PMCPMC12244870

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.