ArticleJournal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences2025
Article in Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Finite Element Analysis of Peri-Implant Stress in Maxillary All-on-Four Rehabilitation: Effects of Posterior Implant Angulation and Loading Protocol.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Evaluating stress distribution and clinical success in varied dental implant designs.Bioinformation · 2026Article
- Biomechanical Influence of Placement Angle and Loading Direction of Orthodontic Miniscrews on Orthotropic Mandible.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Stress distribution on platform switched dental implant technique with different bone type.Bioinformation · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Dental implant design plays a crucial role in stress distribution to the surrounding bone, which directly impacts the longevity and success of the implant. This Materials and Methods: Three implant designs were analyzed: tapered, cylindrical, and hybrid (tapered-cylindrical) implants. Standardized bone models were created to simulate type II bone quality. A vertical load of 200 N and an oblique load of 100 N at a 45° angle were applied to all implant designs. Stress distribution was analyzed using finite element analysis software. Von Mises stress and maximum principal stress values in the cortical and cancellous bones were recorded. Results: The tapered implant showed the least stress concentration in the cortical bone under vertical loading, with an average Von Mises stress of 120 MPa, compared to 150 MPa in cylindrical and 135 MPa in hybrid implants. Under oblique loading, hybrid implants exhibited balanced stress distribution in the cortical and cancellous bones (180 MPa and 70 MPa, respectively), while cylindrical implants showed the highest stress concentration in the cortical bone (200 MPa). Tapered implants demonstrated superior performance in minimizing stress in the cancellous bone (65 MPa under vertical load). Conclusion: Implant design significantly affects stress distribution in the surrounding bone. Tapered implants reduce stress concentration in the cancellous bone, making them suitable for regions with poor bone quality. Hybrid implants, with their balanced stress distribution, may offer advantages in areas requiring load optimization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.