ArticleJournal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences2025
Article in Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Because it allows germs to enter the root canal system, microbial leakage is a primary cause of endodontic failure. The goal of various root canal obturation procedures is to create a hermetic seal that stops microbes from penetrating. Materials and Procedures: The ProTaper Universal system was used to prepare 60 removed human mandibular premolars for this Results: The findings demonstrated that 12 samples (60%) in Group 1, eight samples (40%) in Group 2, and 15 samples (75%) in Group 3 had microbial leakage. The single-cone approach showed the largest microbiological leakage, whereas the thermoplasticized gutta-percha group showed the least amount, followed by lateral compaction. According to statistical analysis, there was a significant difference in leakage across the groups ( Conclusion: In contrast to lateral compaction and the single-cone method, thermoplasticized gutta-percha offered the greatest barrier against microbial leakage. This implies that endodontic failure brought on by bacterial contamination may be avoided more successfully using thermoplasticized procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.