ArticleJournal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences2025
Comparative Study on the Durability of Stainless Steel Crowns vs. Zirconia Crowns for Pediatric Use.
Article in Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Prefabricated zirconia crowns versus alternative full-coverage restorations for primary anterior teeth: a systematic review of clinical outcomes.European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry · 2026Pooled it
- The internal fit and fracture resistance of stainless-steel crowns and porcelain fused to metal crowns in intact and severely damaged permanent molars: an in vitro study.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Biocompatibility, Durability, and Stability Assessment of an Unconstrained Metacarpophalangeal Joint Prosthesis With Zirconia (ZrOJournal of hand surgery global online · 2026Article
- Comparative Evaluation of Esthetic Zirconia Crowns in Children: A Comprehensive Review.Cureus · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The durability of dental crowns is critical in pediatric dentistry to ensure long-term functionality and esthetics. Stainless steel crowns (SSCs) have been a staple in restorative pediatric dentistry, while zirconia crowns (ZCs) have emerged as an esthetic alternative. Materials and Methods: A total of 100 pediatric patients aged 4-8 years were included in the study and randomly divided into two groups: SSC (n = 50) and ZC (n = 50). Crowns were placed on primary molars requiring full-coverage restorations. Durability was evaluated over 12 months based on retention, marginal integrity, wear resistance, and fracture rates. Standardized clinical protocols were followed for crown placement and follow-up assessments at 3, 6, and 12 months. Data were statistically analyzed using a paired Results: The retention rate after 12 months was 98% for SSCs and 92% for ZCs ( Conclusion: Stainless steel crowns demonstrated superior durability in terms of retention, marginal integrity, and fracture resistance compared with zirconia crowns. Although zirconia crowns offer esthetic advantages, their higher fracture rates may limit their use in high-stress applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.