ArticleJournal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences2025
Comparative Analysis of the Color Stability of Different Ceramic Materials after Exposure to Staining Solutions.
Article in Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The impact of tooth brushing simulation and staining thermocycling on surface roughness and color stability of CAD/CAM laminate veneers ceramic materials: an in-vitro study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Effect of airborne particle abrasion on the surface roughness of high-translucent 5Y-PSZ following simulated long-term oral aging: a non-contact optical profilometric in-vitro study.BMC research notes · 2026Article
- Composite resin color stability and surface roughness after exposure to beverages.Bioinformation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Color stability is a critical factor influencing the aesthetic success of ceramic materials in dentistry. This study evaluates and compares the color stability of three commonly used ceramic materials-lithium disilicate, zirconia, and feldspathic porcelain-after exposure to staining solutions to determine their clinical performance under challenging oral conditions. Materials and Methods: A total of 60 ceramic specimens (20 from each material group) were fabricated and polished to standardized dimensions. Each group was subdivided into four subgroups ( Results: The mean ΔE values for lithium disilicate were 4.5 ± 0.8, 5.2 ± 1.0, 3.6 ± 0.6, and 0.9 ± 0.2 for coffee, red wine, cola, and control, respectively. Zirconia exhibited ΔE values of 3.2 ± 0.5, 4.1 ± 0.7, 2.8 ± 0.4, and 0.8 ± 0.1, while feldspathic porcelain showed the highest ΔE values of 6.7 ± 1.2, 7.5 ± 1.4, 5.3 ± 0.9, and 1.0 ± 0.2 for the respective solutions. Statistically significant differences were observed between the materials and staining solutions ( Conclusion: The study revealed significant differences in the color stability of ceramic materials after exposure to staining solutions. Zirconia exhibited superior resistance to staining, followed by lithium disilicate and feldspathic porcelain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.