ArticleJournal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences2025
Comparative Analysis of Fracture Resistance in Teeth Obturated with Graphene Oxide-Modified Sealers.
Article in Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: For long-term success, endodontically treated teeth must be resistant to fracture. The creation of new materials with potential mechanical qualities, such sealers modified with graphene oxide, might increase the longevity of obturated teeth. The purpose of this research is to examine the fracture resistance of teeth that have been sealed using traditional sealers versus sealers modified with graphene oxide. Materials and Methods: Using the ProTaper Gold rotary device, thirty recently removed mandibular premolars were prepped and decoronated to standardize root length. Three groups of 10 samples each were randomly selected: Group 1 was the control group, which did not have any obturation; Group 2 was the group that had teeth sealed with a traditional bioceramic sealer; and Group 3 was the group that had teeth sealed with a sealer modified by graphene oxide. The lateral compaction method was used to fill each root with gutta-percha. To replicate oral circumstances, the samples underwent 500 cycles of thermocycling between 5°C and 55°C. A universal testing machine was used to test for fracture resistance, exerting compressive force at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min till failure. Results: The following were the average fracture resistance values: 300 N ± 25 N was the value for Group 1 (control), 450 N ± 30 N for Group 2 (traditional sealer), and 550 N ± 35 N for Group 3 (graphene oxide-modified sealer). Group 2 had superior resistance than Group 1 ( Conclusion: When compared to traditional sealers, graphene oxide-modified sealers greatly increase the fracture resistance of teeth that have had endodontic treatment. According to these results, graphene oxide may be a useful supplement for enhancing the endodontic sealers' mechanical qualities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.