ArticleJNMA; journal of the Nepal Medical Association2025
Tracking Progress of National Health Summit Declarations - Health Policy Analysis: A Qualitative Study.
Article in JNMA; journal of the Nepal Medical Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The National Health Summit is a policy discussion platform that advocates the policy statement stated by National Health Policy 2019 which results in a set of declarations to address issues in the health system. This study's objective is to monitor the extent of declaration's implementation, its facilitators-barriers, and to formulate recommendation for future National Health Summit declarations and implementation strategies. Methods: This is a qualitative study conducted by Nepal Medical Association. in November-December 2024. Ethical approval from Nepal Health Research Council, Ethical Review Board (Reference number: 1069). The study was designed using the Realistic Evaluation Framework to look into the "context" which are the external factors impacting implementation of the declarations, the "mechanism" which are key elements facilitating or hindering policy changes, and the "outcome" which were the tangible results of NHS declarations. Results: Review and analysis of the participant responses identified policy influene and advocacy as contexts. The mechanisms identified were political and bureaucratic challenges, collaboration, finaicial hurdles, commitment, accountability, leadership, evidence based practices. The outcome discussed were health system strengthening, health workforce, governance, innovation, advocacy and digaital transformations. Conclusions: Implementation of declaration is challenging, with fragmentation as major health issues, however, continuous advocacy has had a synergistic effect in implementation and prioritization of the policy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.