ArticleProceedings. IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine2024
Benchmarking Distance Functions in Siamese Networks for Current and Prior Mammogram Image Analysis.
Article in Proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Hybrid transformer-based model for mammogram classification by integrating prior and current images.Medical physics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mammogram image analysis has benefited from advancements in artificial intelligence (AI), particularly through the use of Siamese networks, which, similar to radiologists, compare current and prior mammogram images to enhance diagnostic accuracy. One of the main challenges in employing Siamese networks for this purpose is selecting an effective distance function. Given the complexity of mammogram images and the high correlation between current and prior images, traditional distance functions in Siamese networks often fall short in capturing the subtle, non-linear differences between these correlated features. This study explores the impact of incorporating non-linear and correlation-sensitive distance functions within a Siamese network framework for analyzing paired mammogram images. We benchmarked different distance functions, including Euclidean, Manhattan, Mahalanobis, Radial Basis Function (RBF), and cosine, and introduced a novel combination of RBF with Matern Covariance. Our evaluation revealed that the RBF with Matern Covariance consistently outperformed other functions, emphasizing the importance of addressing non-linearity and correlation in this context. For instance, the ResNet50 model, when paired with this distance function, achieved an accuracy of 0.938, sensitivity of 0.921, precision of 0.955, specificity of 0.958, F1 score of 0.930, and AUC of 0.940. We observed similarly strong performance across other models as well. Furthermore, the robustness of our approach was confirmed through evaluation on a dataset of 30 cross-validation samples, demonstrating its generalizability. These findings underscore the effectiveness of non-linear and correlation-based distance functions in Siamese networks for improving the performance and generalization of mammogram image analysis. All codes used in this paper are available at https://github.com/NabaviLab/Benchmarking_Distance_Functions_in_Siamese_Networks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.