Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40655433›Full record

ReviewMethodsX2025

Advancements in epilepsy classification: Current trends and future directions.

Rajani Rai B, Karunakara Rai B, Mamatha A S, Kavitha Sooda

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in MethodsX, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rajani Rai BDept.of ECE, Vivekananda College of Engineering and Technology, Puttur, D.K., India.
Karunakara Rai BDept. of ECE, Nitte Meenakshi Institute of Technology, Bangalore, India.
Mamatha A SDept. of ECE, NITTE (Deemed to be University, NMAM Institute of Technology, Nitte, India.
Kavitha SoodaDept. of CSE, BMS College of Engineering, Bangalore, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper presents a comprehensive survey on categorizing focal and non-focal epilepsy using Electroencephalogram (EEG) signals. It emphasizes how recent advances in machine learning and deep learning methodologies assists in overcoming the existing challenges in classification. The paper synthesizes cutting-edge techniques with the focus on the application of hybrid models that combine traditional signal processing techniques with machine learning algorithms. By highlighting key breakthroughs in the field, the paper aims to propose novel directions for improving classification precision. Furthermore, the paper delves into the challenges faced by current methods and the possible solutions. The paper concludes with the discussion on potential future research directions, especially in areas of multimodal data integration and real-time seizure prediction, and emphasizes the potential for AI-driven personalized epilepsy treatment techniques.

Indexed as

ArtifactsClassifiersEEGFeature extractionFocalHybrid approachesMultimodal fusionNon-focalSeizure prediction

Identifiers

PMID40655433
PMCPMC12255359

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.