ArticleAustralasian journal of ultrasound in medicine2025
POCUS to Diagnose a Large Urethral Stone Causing Urinary Retention: A Case Report.
Article in Australasian journal of ultrasound in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- POCUS to Diagnose a Large Urethral Stone Causing Urinary Retention: A Case Report.Australasian journal of ultrasound in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Ultrasound is routinely used in the diagnosis of renal calculi and resulting hydronephrosis. However, its utility in the diagnosis and management of urethral calculi is less well understood. The ability to rapidly diagnose urethral calculi using point of care ultrasound (POCUS) would be useful in the emergency department (ED) to improve patient outcomes and avoid more invasive investigations. Key Findings: This case report presents the occurrence of an obstructed urethral calculus in a 42-year-old male, where POCUS facilitated a prompt and accurate diagnosis. The ability to characterise the size, shape and location of the calculus with the urethra enabled the treating clinicians to avoid further investigations and rapidly treat the obstruction. The stone was removed using artery forceps by the urology team in the ED and POCUS was used afterwards to ensure complete removal and resolution of urinary tract obstruction. Overall, the use of POCUS contributed to the patient's safe management, avoiding radiation exposure and minimising the length of stay in the ED. Discussion: POCUS is a useful tool for evaluating suspected urethral stones to assess for location, size and signs of urinary tract obstruction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.