Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40655380›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of microbiology2025

Metagenomics Analysis of Microbiota in Raw Chicken Stored at Different Temperature over Storage Time in Chennai.

Kareem Siraj, Kathireshan Alagapuram Kaliyaperumal, Gayathri Gururajan, Thenmozhi Geetha Saravanan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kareem SirajDepartment of Microbiology, Vels Institute of Science, Technology and Advanced Studies (VISTAS), Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600117 India.
Kathireshan Alagapuram KaliyaperumalDepartment of Microbiology, Vels Institute of Science, Technology and Advanced Studies (VISTAS), Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600117 India.ORCID 0000-0002-0164-5252
Gayathri GururajanDepartment of Microbiology, Vels Institute of Science, Technology and Advanced Studies (VISTAS), Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600117 India.
Thenmozhi Geetha SaravananCentre for Drug Discovery and Development, Sathyabama Institute of Science and Technology, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600119 India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Poultry meat consumption nowadays demands the need for efficient storage practices for safe and healthy meat. Studying the putative microorganisms for meat spoilage therefore necessitates the effectiveness of storage Microbial types. In this study, poultry meat from Chennai was analyzed for spoilage considering the Microbial types of temperature (- 18 °C and 0-5 °C) and storage time (2, 4, 6 months). Conventional pour plate method was assisted with next generation sequencing to analyze the microbiota and potent spoilage bacteria. Irrespective of the storage temperature, all the samples showed bacteria of phyla Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, Firmicutes, Bacteroidota predominantly. Hafnia-Obesumbacterium and Wohlfahrtiimonas (nearly 10%), Enterococcus (~ 5%), Moellerella and Bacillus (~ 1%) genera were observed in sample stored at the slightly higher temperature. This preliminary study points out that storage temperature is important to maintain shelf life of chicken sample and sample stored at even slightly raised temperature will be spoiled within 10 days. In addition, the need for equipping metagenomics analysis along with conventional method would be required to observe the spoilage at intricate levels.

Indexed as

E. coliFrozen chickenMetagenomicsSalmonellaTemperature

Identifiers

PMID40655380
PMCPMC12246340

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.