Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40655317›Full record

ArticleCancer innovation2025

Mapping the Metastatic Landscape: A Population-Based Cohort Study for Prognostic Insights Into Newly Diagnosed Stage IV Breast Cancer Cases.

Xiangyi Kong, Qiang Liu, Zheng Qu, Xiangyu Wang, Wenxiang Zhang, Yulu Liu, Robert Coleman, Chunqing Lin, Jing Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer innovation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Xiangyi KongDepartment of Breast Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College Beijing China.
Qiang LiuDepartment of Breast Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College Beijing China.
Zheng QuDepartment of Breast Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College Beijing China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-0810-1654
Xiangyu WangDepartment of Breast Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College Beijing China.
Wenxiang ZhangDepartment of Breast Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College Beijing China.
Yulu LiuFintech Lab, Department of Computer Science, Chow Yei Ching Building The University of Hong Kong Pokfulam Hong Kong China.
Robert ColemanDepartment of Oncology and Metabolism University of Sheffield Sheffield UK.
Chunqing LinNational Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College Beijing China.
Jing WangDepartment of Breast Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College Beijing China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Breast cancer is the most common malignancy and a leading cause of cancer-related deaths among women worldwide. Although treatment advances have improved outcomes, the 5-year survival rate for metastatic breast cancer remains low. Understanding the anatomical distribution, associated risks, and prognostic features of metastases in patients with newly diagnosed stage IV breast cancer is essential for improving clinical management. This study aims to comprehensively investigate these aspects using data from the SEER database. Methods: This study utilized a retrospective cohort design, examining data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. The investigation considered patients diagnosed with stage IV breast cancer from SEER database. Using logistic regression, odds ratios (ORs) were calculated to determine the risk of various metastases, stratified based on sociodemographic and clinicopathological variables. Survival analyses were executed with Kaplan-Meier methodology in tandem with Cox regression analyses. Results: Out of 356,789 breast cancer patients considered, 18,036 (5.06%) were diagnosed with de novo stage IV disease. Bone metastasis predominated with a composition ratio of 42.6%. Patients with the HR-/HER2+ subtype exhibited the highest metastasis incidence at the time of diagnosis, constituting 8.7% of the entire cohort. Male patients displayed heightened susceptibility to bone, lung, and brain metastases compared to female counterparts. Hispanic individuals exhibited the highest propensity for brain metastases. Relative to other subtypes, the HR-/HER2- patients were more inclined toward lung metastases. Those with bone metastasis had a median survival period of 27 months. Grade III patients with brain or liver metastases faced the most adverse prognoses. A comprehensive profile detailing metastasis patterns by demographics, tumor site and stage, biology, and treatment was presented. Conclusions: This study represents the most comprehensive analysis of metastasis' anatomical distribution and prognosis in breast cancer, offering invaluable insights into metastatic tendencies and characteristics.

Indexed as

distant metastasisdistribution and prognosisnewly diagnosed stage IV breast cancerpopulation‐based studysociodemographic and clinicopathological factor

Identifiers

PMID40655317
PMCPMC12245729

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.