ArticleJournal of experimental orthopaedics2025
Short graft, short tunnel ACL reconstruction with single hamstring and internal brace leads to comparable outcomes to conventional double hamstring technique: A retrospective study.
Article in Journal of experimental orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Short graft, short tunnel ACL reconstruction with single hamstring and internal brace leads to comparable outcomes to conventional double hamstring technique: A retrospective study.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of our study was to compare (1) ACL graft healing, (2) patient-reported outcome, and (3) complications after short graft (length < 65 mm), short tunnel (femoral tunnel < 20 mm) single hamstring ACL reconstruction with an internal brace (SGST-ACLR) technique and double hamstring autograft conventional ACL reconstruction (CON-ACLR) technique at minimum 2-year follow-up. Methods: A retrospective cohort of patients underwent arthroscopic ACL reconstruction using a hamstring graft, with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Graft healing was evaluated at 1 year using a magnetic resonance imaging scan, with the mean signal-to-noise quotient ratio (SNQ) measured from three areas: proximal, middle, and distal to the ACL graft. Patients' demographics data, meniscal lesion, chondral lesion, time to operation, time to evaluation, PROMs (International Knee Documentation Committee [IKDC] scores, Tegner activity scale, and Lysholm score), and complications were evaluated. ACL laxity was measured using a side-to-side difference (SSD) by a lachmeter. Results: A total of 51 patients, comprising 25 in the SGST-ACLR group and 26 in the CONV-ACLR group, were analysed. The ACL graft diameter was comparable between the two groups ( Conclusion: At two years postoperatively, this study demonstrates that SGST-ACLR with an internal brace provides comparable outcomes in all parameters to CONV-ACLR. Thus, SGST-ACLR offers a viable alternative technique for ACL reconstruction, with the added advantage of minimising graft usage. Level of Evidence: Level IV, retrospective cohort study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.