ArticleJournal of experimental orthopaedics2025
Reduced quadriceps deficit following dry arthroscopy compared to standard fluid arthroscopy at the time of MPFL reconstruction.
Article in Journal of experimental orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Reduced quadriceps deficit following dry arthroscopy compared to standard fluid arthroscopy at the time of MPFL reconstruction.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Recurrent patellar dislocations (RPDs) are prevalent, particularly among adolescents. The 'Menu à la carte' technique facilitates personalized management of each patient through reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) while simultaneously addressing other anatomical factors that may contribute to instability. Arthroscopy, frequently performed prior to stabilization surgery to identify and treat intra-articular pathology, carries specific risks. Fluid arthroscopy can increase post-operative effusion, while dry arthroscopy may expose cartilage to potential damage due to the absence of fluid, increasing friction and thermal effects. Concurrent knee arthroscopy to evaluate and address intra-articular pathology at the time of MPFL may contribute to post-operative quadriceps deficits that can significantly impact recovery. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate and compare quadriceps recovery following either traditional fluid or dry arthroscopy at MPFL reconstruction. The hypothesis was that MPFL reconstruction with fluid arthroscopy would result in more significant quadriceps deficiency, more effusions, and decreased early post-operative knee flexion compared to the dry arthroscopy group. Methods: This retrospective study analyzed 66 patients who underwent MPFL reconstruction for RPD between February 2020 and February 2024. Exclusion criteria included trochleoplasty, tibial tubercle osteotomy, or missed isokinetic tests beyond 6 months post-operatively. Patients underwent fluid arthroscopy until September 2021 and dry arthroscopy thereafter. Post-operative follow-up at 6 weeks recorded range of motion, patellar apprehension and clinical diagnosis of knee effusion, while isokinetic testing at 4-6 months compared peak torque and muscle strength between the fluid and air arthroscopy groups. Results: Isokinetic tests revealed a significant deficit in quadriceps strength of the operated knees during MPFL reconstructions performed under fluid compared to those performed dry, both at concentric 60°/s (73.3 ± 33.8 vs. 95.5 ± 39.5 N m/kg; Conclusion: This study has demonstrated a significant quadriceps strength deficit in isokinetic tests following fluid arthroscopy compared to dry arthroscopy as well as a higher incidence of effusion and flexion deficit post-operative. These findings highlight the potential for dry arthroscopy to assess intra-articular pathology during MPFL reconstruction. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective, case-control study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.