ArticleJournal of experimental orthopaedics2025
High accuracy and learning curve improvement of augmented reality in total knee arthroplasty: A single-centre study on 157 patients.
Article in Journal of experimental orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Augmented Reality-Assisted vs Manual Total Knee Arthroplasty: Clinical and Perioperative Outcomes in a Consecutive Single-Surgeon Cohort.Arthroplasty today · 2026Article
- High accuracy and learning curve improvement of augmented reality in total knee arthroplasty: A single-centre study on 157 patients.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Augmented reality (AR) technology is emerging as a viable alternative for improving surgical precision in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). While previous studies have assessed AR accuracy, limited research has explored its learning curve and long-term performance. This study evaluates the accuracy of an AR-assisted system in achieving pre-planned osteotomies and investigates potential improvements over time with increased surgical experience. Methods: A total of 157 patients underwent TKA using an AR-based guidance system, with preoperative planning defining varus/valgus and posterior slope angles. The achieved angles were compared to planned values using two error assessment metrics. Additionally, the data from the first 76 procedures were compared to the last 81 to assess a learning curve effect. Surgical time and blood loss were also evaluated. Results: The AR system maintained high accuracy, with mean deviations of 0.47 ± 0.54° for varus/valgus and 0.76 ± 0.74° for posterior slope. Errors remained below 1° in the majority of cases (98.1% for varus/valgus and 86.0% for posterior slope). Over time, a learning effect was observed, with mean errors decreasing by up to 44.6% for varus/valgus and 8.6% for posterior slope. No significant differences were found in surgery duration or blood loss between the AR and control groups. Conclusions: This study confirms the reliability of AR-based guidance in TKA, demonstrating its ability to achieve precise osteotomies with minimal intraoperative variability. Additionally, the results suggest a learning curve effect, with improved accuracy over time. These findings support AR as a promising, cost-effective alternative to robotic navigation in knee surgery. Level of Evidence: Level II.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.