Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40655242›Full record

ReviewJournal of experimental orthopaedics2025

Clinical outcomes of kinematically aligned medial pivot total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis of current evidence.

Francesco Bosco, Giorgio Cacciola, Virginia Masoni, Carmelo Burgio, Mariazzurra Carlino, Michele Centola, Ferdinando Tosto, Daniele Vezza, Lawrence Camarda, Luigi Sabatini

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of experimental orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Francesco BoscoDepartment of Precision Medicine in Medical, Surgical and Critical Care (Me.Pre.C.C.) University of Palermo Palermo Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8306-1869
Giorgio CacciolaDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University of Turin CTO Turin Italy.
Virginia MasoniDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University of Turin CTO Turin Italy.
Carmelo BurgioAdult Reconstruction and Joint Replacement Service Hospital for Special Surgery New York New York USA.
Mariazzurra CarlinoDepartment Statistics, Economics and Business,Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna Bologna Italy.
Michele CentolaDepartment of Orthopaedics, Gradenigo Hospital Humanitas Turin Italy.
Ferdinando TostoDepartment of Orthopaedics, Gradenigo Hospital Humanitas Turin Italy.
Daniele VezzaDepartment of Orthopaedics, Gradenigo Hospital Humanitas Turin Italy.
Lawrence CamardaDepartment of Precision Medicine in Medical, Surgical and Critical Care (Me.Pre.C.C.) University of Palermo Palermo Italy.
Luigi SabatiniDepartment of Orthopaedics, Gradenigo Hospital Humanitas Turin Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Kinematic alignment (KA) in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) focuses on restoring the natural joint line and ligament balance, potentially improving biomechanics and outcomes over mechanical alignment (MA). The medial pivot (MP) implant enhances joint stability by mimicking physiological knee motion. Still, its role within a KA protocol and the effects of retaining versus sacrificing the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) are unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical effectiveness, functional outcomes and biomechanical benefits of KA-TKA with MP implants based on the available literature. It also aimed to assess whether PCL retention or sacrifice leads to better postoperative function. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following PRISMA guidelines. A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase and Web of Science up to January 2025 identified studies assessing KA-TKA with MP implants. Primary outcomes included patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), range of motion (ROM), complication rates and implant survivorship. Subgroup analysis compared PCL retention and sacrifice. Results: Fourteen studies (955 patients) met inclusion criteria. KA-TKA with MP implants resulted in significant ROM improvements (+11.35°, increased to +12.50° after sensitivity analysis) and enhanced PROMs (Oxford Knee Score +18.23, increased to +22.27 after sensitivity analysis; Knee Society Score [KSS] +49.61, functional KSS +42.50). No aseptic loosening or implant failures were reported. PCL sacrifice was associated with greater postoperative flexion (125.4° ± 12.1° vs. 116.4° ± 11.8°, Conclusions: KA-TKA with MP implants improves functional recovery, patient satisfaction, and short- to mid-term survivorship, supporting its adoption as a viable alternative to conventional TKA. Further long-term, randomized trials are needed to optimize PCL management and confirm its durability. Level of Evidence: Level IV.

Indexed as

biomechanicskinematic alignmentmedial pivotposterior cruciate ligamenttotal knee arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID40655242
PMCPMC12255947

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.