Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40655219›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2025

Development and validation of PRE-FRA (PREdiction of FRAilty risk in community older adults) frailty prediction model.

Taiping Lin, Xiaotao Huang, Xiang Wang, Miao Dai, Jirong Yue

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Taiping Lin *Department of Geriatrics and National Clinical Research Center for Geriatrics, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Xiaotao Huang *Department of Gastroenterology, Jiangyou Hospital, Mianyang, Sichuan, China.
Xiang Wang *Jiujiang CityKey Laboratory of Cell Therapy, Department of Cardiology, Jiujiang NO.1 People's Hospital, Jiujiang, Jiangxi, China.
Miao DaiJiujiang CityKey Laboratory of Cell Therapy, Department of Geriatrics, Jiujiang NO.1 People's Hospital, Jiujiang, Jiangxi, China.
Jirong YueDepartment of Geriatrics and National Clinical Research Center for Geriatrics, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: As the global population ages, identifying older adults at risk of frailty becomes increasingly important for targeted interventions. This study aimed to develop and validate a 1-year frailty onset prediction model for initially non-frailty or pre-frailty, community-dwelling older adults. Methods: We enrolled 1,079 community-dwelling older adults aged >60 years without baseline frailty (i.e., non-frailty or pre-frailty) for the development cohort. Lasso regression was used to screen potential predictors. Subsequently, logistic regression analysis was conducted to create a nomogram, which was internally validated using 500 bootstrap resamples. Additionally, temporal validation was performed to ensure the model's generalizability. This validation involved an external cohort of 481 older adults, all aged over 60 years and without frailty at baseline. Discrimination was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), and calibration was evaluated with calibration plots. Results: In the development cohort, we enrolled 1,079 older adults with a median age of 68.00 years (interquartile range: 64.00-72.00), including 673 females. Over a 1-year follow-up, 73 cases of frailty were identified. Key predictors identified by the model included age, history of falls within the past month, coughing while drinking water, pre-frailtyty status, cognitive impairment, 5-time chair stand test, and calf circumference. The developed model exhibited favorable discriminative ability in the development cohort (AUROC = 0.81, 95% confidence interval 0.76-0.87). Internal validation through bootstrapping yielded consistent results (AUROC = 0.80), while temporal validation confirmed its robustness (AUROC = 0.73). Calibration plots demonstrated favorable agreement in both the development and temporal validation cohorts. To enhance usability, an online web-based calculator was developed (accessible at: https://frailtyriskprediction.shinyapps.io/dynnomapp/). The model showed high sensitivity (0.92) for frailty exclusion at a 2.5% threshold and specificity (0.89) for frailty identification at a 15% threshold. Conclusion: This 1-year frailty onset prediction model for initially non-frailty or pre-frailty older adults integrates accessible variables and demonstrates robust validation. It aids clinical decision-making by identifying high-risk individuals for early intervention.

Indexed as

Frail ElderlyFrailtyGeriatric AssessmentIndependent LivingAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRisk AssessmentRisk Factorscommunity-dwellingfrailtyLasso regressionnomogramolder adultsprediction modelvalidation

Identifiers

PMID40655219
PMCPMC12245915

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.