ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Construction of a prediction model for sarcopenic obesity based on machine learning.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- GRU-based de novo design and in-silico prioritization of EZH2 inhibitors.Molecular diversity · 2026Article
- Sarcopenic obesity in older adults: a scoping review of prevalence, assessment tools, associated factors, and interventions.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Development of a sarcopenic obesity risk prediction model for older adults based on the CHARLS database.BMC geriatrics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In the context of the rapidly aging global population, sarcopenic obesity (SO) in older adults is associated with significantly higher rates of disability and mortality. SO has become a serious and critical public health concern. This study aimed to develop and validate predictive models using machine learning (ML) to identify SO in patients. Methods: Data from 386 participants collected at the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University were divided into an 8:2 ratio, with 80% used for training and 20% for testing. Univariate analysis was performed to identify the factors correlated with SO, and multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the independent factors influencing SO. The Shapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) diagram was used to illustrate the importance of variables in the model. To develop a predictive model for SO, we used five models and applied internal five-fold cross-validation to determine the most suitable hyperparameters for the model. Results: Among 386 participants, 61 were diagnosed with sarcopenic obesity (15.8%). We identified four independent predictive factors, namely BMI, Barthel Index score, grip strength, and calf circumference. Notably, calf circumference plays an important role in assessing the risk of SO in older adults. The area under the curve (AUC) values of the test set for the Random forest (RF), naive Bayes (NB), Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM), k-nearest neighbor algorithm (KNN), and eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) models were recorded as 0.839, 0.815, 0.808, 0.794, and 0.798, respectively. Among these models, the RF model exhibited the best average performance in the training set, with an AUC value of 0.839. Conclusion: We constructed a predictive model based on the results of the RF model, combining four clinical predictors-BMI, Barthel Index score, grip strength, and calf circumference-to reliably predict SO.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.