ArticleJournal of chemical education2025
Enhancing Student Engagement and Success in General Chemistry Through Supplemental Co-Class Models.
Article in Journal of chemical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in the spring of 2020 led to a widespread transition from traditional face-to-face instruction to remote learning during the 2020-2021 academic year. The lack of in-person instruction posed unique challenges, particularly for students transitioning from high school to college, exacerbating existing educational disparities for those already experiencing opportunity gaps. In response to these challenges, we developed an in-person supplementary course (CHE 98) aimed at improving student outcomes and facilitating the transition from virtual to in-person learning, particularly for first-generation andlow-income students. CHE 98 was implemented at the University of California, Davis, to offer both academic and social support to students enrolled in General Chemistry. The course offered small group sessions (10-20 students), fostering engagement and participation, unlike the larger General Chemistry lectures (500-600 students), which often felt more competitive. These smaller settings fostered greater engagement and participation while also boosting self-esteem, in contrast to the competitive environment of larger class formats. Data showed that approximately 63% of CHE 98 students earned a grade of C or higher compared to only 26% in the control group. CHE 98 students not only showed better academic performance but also experienced increased self-esteem and participation due to the smaller, more supportive learning environment. The success of CHE 98 demonstrates the effectiveness of targeted academic support in improving outcomes in STEM, particularly in their transitions from high school to college.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.