ArticleInternational journal of special education2022
Scholastic status of congenitally blind children following sight surgery.
Article in International journal of special education, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
India is home to a large population of blind children, many with treatable conditions. Project Prakash identifies treatable blind children and provides them with eye surgeries. Once treated, these children are given the opportunity to further their education. To understand their educational needs, we undertook a diagnostic screening exercise. Specifically, we designed math proficiency assessments and evaluated the scholastic preparation of 54 Prakash children across a broad age range. We found that the proficiency of most Prakash children was well below age-appropriate levels. Even those enrolled in high schools had assessed proficiencies around the 3rd-grade level. Furthermore, due to a lack of basic instruction on interpreting print material, many children continued using Braille even after gaining sight. The contrast that these findings present relative to the official standing of the children in their schools makes a compelling case for more rigorous assessments and better educational interventions for visually-impaired/sight-restored children. Also, we argue that these educational interventions should be coupled with visual function assessments to ensure that the presented material is accessible to the child. Our scholastic assessments, suitable for being administered over the phone, will be made available for use by other researchers and educationists.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.