ArticleImmunoTargets and therapy2025
Inhibition of Aspartate β-Hydroxylase Enhances Anti-Tumor Immunity.
Article in ImmunoTargets and therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Aspartate β-hydroxylase (ASPH) contributes to carcinogenesis by promoting tumor cell proliferation, migration, and invasion. The enzymatic activity of ASPH can be inhibited by small molecule inhibitors that have been shown to have anti-metastatic activity in rodent models. ASPH has also been shown to inhibit the activation of natural killer (NK) cells. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the effect of ASPH inhibition on the induction of anti-tumor immunity and to analyze the immune cells involved. Methods: In the mouse TC-1/A9 model characterized by reversible downregulation of major histocompatibility class I (MHC-I) molecules, ASPH inhibition was combined with stimulation of innate and/or adaptive immunity, and the anti-tumor response was analyzed by evaluation of tumor growth, in vivo depletion of immune cell subpopulations, and ELISPOT assay. Characteristics of immune cells in the spleen and tumor were determined by flow cytometry and single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq). Results: ASPH inhibition did not reduce tumor growth or promote the anti-tumor effect of innate immunity stimulation with the synthetic oligonucleotide ODN1826, but it significantly enhanced tumor growth reduction induced by DNA vaccination. In vivo immune cell depletion suggested that CD8 Conclusion: ASPH inhibition stimulated T-cell-mediated adaptive immunity induced by DNA vaccination. Different types of lymphoid and myeloid cells were likely involved in the activated immune response that was efficient against tumors with MHC-I downregulation, which are often resistant to T-cell-based therapies. Due to different types of activated immune cells, ASPH inhibition could improve immunotherapy for tumors with various MHC-I expression levels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.