ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
Efficacy and safety analysis of montelukast sodium added on azithromycin in the treatment of
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Therapeutic Efficacy of an Anti-P116-661 Polyclonal Antibody AgainstPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of using montelukast sodium added on azithromycin for the treatment of pediatric Methods: Retrospective analysis showed that 122 children with MPP were divided into a control group (61 cases received azithromycin treatment) and a study group (61 cases received azithromycin combined with montelukast sodium treatment) according to different treatment plans. Both groups were treated for 7 days, and lung function, lung compliance, chest CT signal, inflammatory immune status, and side effects were compared before and after treatment. Result: After a month of treatment, positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) levels were lower in the research group compared to the control group's kids, whereas forced vital capacity (FVC), tidal volume (TV), peak expiratory flow rate (PEF), pulmonary ventilation per minute (MVV), and pulmonary dynamic compliance (Cdyn) levels were greater ( Conclusion: Azithromycin plus montelukast sodium can effectively improve the lung function and lung compliance of children with MPP, reduce the detection rate of chest CT signs of disease symptoms, and improve the inflammatory and immune state of the body, without increasing adverse reactions, and the clinical application is safe.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.