ArticleBasic and clinical neuroscience
Chilling and Blurring Negative Memories: An Experimental Memory Training Study.
Article in Basic and clinical neuroscience. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The present study examined how broadening attentional scope (BAS) during acquisition and working memory interference (WMI) during reconsolidation could influence memory formation. Methods: A total of 95 participants were randomly assigned to inactive control (n=30), BAS (n=33), and WMI (n=32) groups. While watching a traumatic film, the participants in the BAS group were instructed to allocate their attention to the peripheral details of the film, while participants in the WMI group performed a spatial working memory task. Memory vividness and emotionality were assessed before and after the intervention using a visual analog scale, and valence, arousal, and dominance were measured by self-assessment manikin immediately after watching the film. Moreover, all participants were asked to record their intrusive memory for 3 days after the experiment. The statistical software package SPSS was used to make group comparisons. Results: Our results suggested that interfering with visuospatial working memory during retrieving emotionally valenced memories could significantly reduce the vividness of mental images from pre- to post-assessments (P=0.004). However, we found no significant differences between the three groups regarding emotionality, arousal, dominance, and the number of intrusive memories. Conclusion: Participants in the WMI group outperformed in blurring the negatively valenced memory at the posttest. In contrast with our primary assumption, BAS made no significant changes compared to the other two groups. Future studies with larger sample sizes and objective measurements may provide additional evidence on the efficacy of these methods, specifically in the context of clinical implications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.