ArticleBasic and clinical neuroscience
Efficacy of Intensive Short-term Dynamic Psychotherapy, Laser Acupuncture, and the Combination in Major Depression.
Article in Basic and clinical neuroscience. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: While major depression has been treated with laser acupuncture (LA) and intensive short-term dynamic psychotherapy (ISTDP), the relative efficacy of these two methods and their combination is unclear. ISTDP is a form of dynamic psychotherapy that enables the experience and processing of blocked complex feelings, while LA is based on the opening of blocked energy meridians. The present study aimed to compare the effectiveness of LA and ISTDP and their combination in treating major depression. Methods: A randomized controlled trial was carried out with 45 depressed patients on three equal arms (15 patients in each group): Group I) LA, group II) ISTDP, and group III) combined LA and ISTDP. The participants were evaluated at six time points using the Hamilton rating depression scale (HDRS), structured clinical interview for structured clinical interview for DSM (SCID), and symptom checklist-90 (SCL90), including baseline, session 8, session 12, 1-month follow-up, 2-month follow-up, and 3- month follow-up. Results: HDRS and SCID ratings showed within-group reductions in SCL90 and HDRS scores in the three groups over time. At one of the follow-up times, combined LA+ISTDP showed a greater reduction than either individual treatment on the SCL-90 depression subscale but not on HDRS or SCID. Conclusion: Based on releasing blocked energies, the results of this study indicate that LA and ISTDP are effective in treating major depression. The combination of the two methods may be more effective in reducing depression symptoms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.