ArticleCureus2025
Endoscopic Cyclophotocoagulation as a Minimally Invasive Glaucoma Surgery in Clinical Practice: Appropriate for All Stages?
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Preclinical assessment of Preserflo MicroShunt implantation using an intraocular endoscope-holding robot.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation (ECP), originally developed for the treatment of refractory glaucoma, has seen expanding use in recent years as a minimally invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS), particularly when combined with cataract extraction. ECP reduces intraocular pressure (IOP) by suppressing aqueous humor production through targeted ablation of the ciliary processes under endoscopic guidance. This contrasts fundamentally with outflow-enhancing MIGS, which aim to restore impaired physiological function. Theoretical modeling suggests that reductions in aqueous production following ECP may approximate changes that occur over several decades of natural aging. While ECP spares the conjunctiva and is repeatable, its irreversible suppression of aqueous production may raise long-term physiological concerns. Given that aqueous humor supports the metabolic environment of anterior segment structures, sustained suppression may impact ocular homeostasis. Although clinically noteworthy complications remain rare, the growing use of ECP in non-refractory cases necessitates careful consideration. Especially as green-laser ECP is newly introduced in Japan and primarily used for refractory glaucoma, I believe it is important to revisit the fundamental differences between outflow- and inflow-targeting procedures and evaluate the broader implications of routine ECP application across glaucoma stages.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.