ArticleCureus2025
Poorly Differentiated Extraocular Sebaceous Carcinoma Masquerading as an Abscess.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Extraocular sebaceous carcinoma (SC) is an uncommon but potentially aggressive tumor. Typical presentation is a red-yellow nodule, often ulcerated, on the head and neck of an older individual. Factors increasing the risk of SC include genetic mutations, ultraviolet light exposure, prior radiation, and immunosuppression. A 63-year-old Caucasian man presented with an enlarging, painful subcutaneous mass on his left arm, which was ultimately diagnosed as a poorly differentiated extraocular SC. Given the aggressive tumor subtype and large size of the lesion, he was definitively treated with wide local excision and sentinel lymph node biopsy. While his past medical history and family history were significant for colon cancer, he declined further genetic workup and testing. Risk factors for metastasis of SC include a tumor diameter greater than 2 cm, rapid growth, high histologic grade, or poor differentiation. As poorly differentiated extraocular SC is associated with a higher rate of nodal involvement, management with complete surgical resection and evaluation (sentinel lymph node biopsy or imaging) to determine whether metastatic spread has occurred may be of benefit to establish if further procedures, radiation, or therapeutics are indicated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.