Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40655030›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025

Mechanical Artifacts During Transcranial Focused Ultrasound Mimic Biologically Evoked Responses.

Duc Nguyen, Elisa Konofagou, Jacek P Dmochowski

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Duc NguyenDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, City College of New York, New York NY 10031.
Elisa KonofagouDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University, New York NY 10027.ORCID 0000-0002-9636-7936
Jacek P DmochowskiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, City College of New York, New York NY 10031.ORCID 0000-0001-6482-5691

Funding

Explaining the variability in focused ultrasound neuromodulationR16GM145496 · NIGMS · CITY COLLEGE OF NEW YORK · PI DMOCHOWSKI, JACEK · 2022 to 2025
$627k
NIGMS NIH HHS R16 GM145496
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Low-intensity transcranial focused ultrasound stimulation (tFUS) has emerged as a promising technique for non-invasive neuromodulation, offering deep brain penetration and high spatial precision. However, the electrophysiological effects of tFUS remain poorly understood, in part due to challenges distinguishing genuine neural responses from mechanical artifacts. Here we investigated the electrophysiological signatures captured during tFUS of the anesthetized rat hippocampus using silicon microelectrodes. We observed a strong, stereotyped local field potential (LFP) response that was time-locked to the onset and offset of sonication and resembled sensory-evoked potentials. Critically, the same waveform was observed in euthanized animals, confirming a non-biological, artifact-driven origin. The artifact scaled with acoustic intensity and was most pronounced under continuous-wave sonication. These findings suggest that electrode movement induced by ultrasound can generate artifactual LFP signals that closely mimic authentic neural responses. Our results underscore the need for caution when interpreting in situ electrophysiological recordings during tFUS and advocate for alternative, artifact-resistant readouts such as fiber photometry to unambiguously detect neuromodulatory effects.

Indexed as

hippocampuslocal field potentialnon-invasive brain stimulationtranscranial focused ultrasound stimulationultrasonic neuromodulation

Identifiers

PMID40655030
PMCPMC12247832

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.