ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
Mechanical Artifacts During Transcranial Focused Ultrasound Mimic Biologically Evoked Responses.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Low-intensity transcranial focused ultrasound stimulation (tFUS) has emerged as a promising technique for non-invasive neuromodulation, offering deep brain penetration and high spatial precision. However, the electrophysiological effects of tFUS remain poorly understood, in part due to challenges distinguishing genuine neural responses from mechanical artifacts. Here we investigated the electrophysiological signatures captured during tFUS of the anesthetized rat hippocampus using silicon microelectrodes. We observed a strong, stereotyped local field potential (LFP) response that was time-locked to the onset and offset of sonication and resembled sensory-evoked potentials. Critically, the same waveform was observed in euthanized animals, confirming a non-biological, artifact-driven origin. The artifact scaled with acoustic intensity and was most pronounced under continuous-wave sonication. These findings suggest that electrode movement induced by ultrasound can generate artifactual LFP signals that closely mimic authentic neural responses. Our results underscore the need for caution when interpreting in situ electrophysiological recordings during tFUS and advocate for alternative, artifact-resistant readouts such as fiber photometry to unambiguously detect neuromodulatory effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.