Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40654806›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025

Amorphous silicon resistors enable smaller pixels in photovoltaic retinal prosthesis.

Andrew Shin, Nathan Jensen, Emma Butt, Jeonghyun An, Davis Pham-Howard, Ludwig Galambos, Keith Mathieson, Theodore Kamins, Daniel Palanker

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Andrew ShinDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, US.ORCID 0000-0002-9323-189X
Nathan JensenDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, US.ORCID 0009-0002-4281-0493
Emma ButtInstitute of Photonics, Department of Physics, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1622-3818
Jeonghyun AnDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, US.
Davis Pham-HowardHansen Experimental Physics Laboratory, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, US.ORCID 0009-0006-6637-2124
Ludwig GalambosDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, US.
Keith MathiesonInstitute of Photonics, Department of Physics, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9517-8076
Theodore KaminsDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, US.ORCID 0000-0001-8319-1161
Daniel PalankerHansen Experimental Physics Laboratory, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, US.ORCID 0000-0002-0480-3025

Funding

Stanford Vision Research CoreP30EY026877 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Jeffrey L Goldberg · 2017 to 2026
$8.0M
Electronic photoreceptors for restoration of sight in retinal degenerationR01EY035227 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI DANIEL V PALANKER · 2023 to 2026
$2.7M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY026877NEI NIH HHS R01 EY035227
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Clinical trials of the photovoltaic subretinal prosthesis PRIMA demonstrated feasibility of prosthetic central vision with resolution matching its 100μm pixel size. To improve prosthetic acuity further, pixel size should be decreased. However, there are multiple challenges, one of which is related to accommodating a compact shunt resistor within each pixel that discharges the electrodes between stimulation pulses and helps increase the contrast of the electric field pattern. Unfortunately, standard materials used in integrated circuit resistors do not match the resistivity required for small photovoltaic pixels. Therefore, we used a novel material - doped amorphous silicon (a-Si) and integrated it into photovoltaic arrays with pixel sizes down to 20μm. Approach: To fit within a few μm Main Results: High-resolution retinal implants with integrated shunt resistors were fabricated with values ranging from 0.75 to 4 MΩ on top of the photovoltaic pixels of 55, 40, 30 and 20 μm in size. Photoresponsivity with all pixel sizes was approximately 0.53 A/W, as high as in the arrays with no shunt resistor. The shunts shortened electrodes discharge time, with the average electric potential in electrolyte decreasing by only 21-31% when repetition rate increased from 2 to 30 Hz, as opposed to a 54-55% decrease without a shunt. Similarly, contrast of a Landolt C pattern increased from 16-22% with no shunt to 22-34% with a shunt. Further improvement in contrast is expected with pillar electrodes and local returns within each pixel. Significance: Miniature shunt resistors in a MOhm range can be fabricated from doped a-Si in a process compatible with manufacturing of photovoltaic arrays. The shunt resistors improved current injection and spatial contrast at video frame rates, without compromising the photoresponsivity. These advances are critical for scaling pixel sizes below 100 μm to improve visual acuity of prosthetic vision.

Identifiers

PMID40654806
PMCPMC12248045

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.