ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
Opposing, multiplexed information in lateral and ventral orbitofrontal cortex guides sequential foraging decisions in rats.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Far medial and lateral aspects of the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) serve distinct roles in value-based decision-making, though it remains unclear how more nearby lateral and ventral aspects differ in their information-processing characteristics. The present study leveraged high-density neural recording in the lateral orbital (LO) and ventral orbital (VO) subregions using a neuroeconomic task in rats to clarify how functional heterogeneity between LO and VO participates in sequential cost-benefit foraging. LO and VO contained opposing representations of an encountered reward's subjective benefit and its associated opportunity costs, respectively. The relative balance of these representations tracked decisions to approach or leave a reward during each stage of an encounter. Opposing representations of subjective benefit in LO and opportunity costs in VO were realized by distinct clusters of cells within each subregion across stages of a reward encounter (i.e., task state). In addition, overall activity in each subregion scaled with changes in the subjective value of rewards induced by external, economic conditions (reward scarcity) and internal, motivational factors (hunger). Collectively, these results suggest that lateral and ventral OFC encode opposing representations to guide sequential foraging decisions, but using a shared coding scheme which multiplexes information about subjective value (via overall activity) and world states (via distinct ensembles).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.