Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40654796›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025

Opposing, multiplexed information in lateral and ventral orbitofrontal cortex guides sequential foraging decisions in rats.

Paul J Cunningham, A David Redish

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Paul J CunninghamDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis MN, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9610-356X
A David RedishDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis MN, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3644-9072

Funding

Comorbidity: Substance Use Disorders and Other Psychiatric ConditionsT32DA037183 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI Anna Zilverstand · 2014 to 2026
$3.2M
NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA037183
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Far medial and lateral aspects of the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) serve distinct roles in value-based decision-making, though it remains unclear how more nearby lateral and ventral aspects differ in their information-processing characteristics. The present study leveraged high-density neural recording in the lateral orbital (LO) and ventral orbital (VO) subregions using a neuroeconomic task in rats to clarify how functional heterogeneity between LO and VO participates in sequential cost-benefit foraging. LO and VO contained opposing representations of an encountered reward's subjective benefit and its associated opportunity costs, respectively. The relative balance of these representations tracked decisions to approach or leave a reward during each stage of an encounter. Opposing representations of subjective benefit in LO and opportunity costs in VO were realized by distinct clusters of cells within each subregion across stages of a reward encounter (i.e., task state). In addition, overall activity in each subregion scaled with changes in the subjective value of rewards induced by external, economic conditions (reward scarcity) and internal, motivational factors (hunger). Collectively, these results suggest that lateral and ventral OFC encode opposing representations to guide sequential foraging decisions, but using a shared coding scheme which multiplexes information about subjective value (via overall activity) and world states (via distinct ensembles).

Indexed as

decision-makingforaginglateral orbitalneuroeconomicsOrbitofrontal cortexSubjective valuetask stateventral orbital

Identifiers

PMID40654796
PMCPMC12248009

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.