ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
Lineage-Specific Evolution, Structural Diversity, and Activity of R2 Retrotransposons in Animals.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Retrotransposons play outsized roles in the evolution of gene regulation, genome function, and disease pathogenesis and more recently, have sparked interest as workhorses for new gene therapy approaches. R2 retrotransposons insert site-specifically to the multicopy genes encoding 28S ribosomal RNA at a target sequence conserved broadly across eukaryotic evolution. R2 retrotransposons have been detected in many animals, but previous surveys have been limited in scope and methodology. Here, we substantially expand the known distribution of R2 retrotransposons from previously unrepresented or underrepresented taxonomic groups ranging from ctenophores to amphibians and reptiles. We discover diverse R2 domain architectures and motifs and identify many new avian R2 candidates for genome engineering development. Overall, phylogenetic analyses reveal two highly successful R2 lineages. We observe properties of each lineage in several features of the domains that mediate DNA recognition and in co-evolving signatures within the reverse transcriptase domain. Within each of the two lineages, R2 protein sequences do not necessarily preserve the unifying configuration of N-terminal DNA-binding domains implied in the current clade classification scheme. We show that recombinant R2 proteins with distinctive domain architectures and distribution across major animal classes support target-primed reverse transcription with conserved site specificity. Our analysis of the surprisingly varied domain architectures that support target-site specificity informs new R2 classification criteria and provides a greatly expanded foundation for additional structure/function insights about DNA binding selectivity. This expanded perspective on R2 evolution informs approaches for engineering therapeutic gene insertion technologies and offers an opportunity to investigate the conservation and diversification of retrotransposons.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.