ArticleInternational journal of trichology
Frequency of Types of Alopecia in a Single-centre Hair Referral Clinic Over a Ten Years Period.
Article in International journal of trichology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- GLP-1 therapies and hair loss: A systematic review of current evidence and implications for counseling.Science progressPooled it
- Scalp Biopsies for Alopecia.Dermatopathology (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Causal Relationship Between Sleep Characteristics and Alopecia Areata and Other Non-Scarring Alopecia: A Two-Sample Bidirectional Mendelian Randomization Analysis.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2025Article
- A Critic of Retrospective Multicenter Studies in Clinical Trichology.International journal of trichologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The frequencies of the different types of alopecia in hair referral centres have so far been reported in a single multicentre study at multiple specialist hair clinics over a time period of one month. Aim: Single center studies over a longer time-frame offer a more representative and homogeneous study population with regard to ethnic, demographic, and climatic factors, and seasonality of hair growth and shedding than multicenter studies over a short time frame. Materials and Methods: Retrospective study of patient data at a single centre over 10 years. Results: A total of 15'211 patients (73% female, 27% male) were included, and we found the following frequencies: pattern hair loss (67%), alopecia areata (11%), the cicatricial alopecias (11%), and telogen effluvium (7%). Among the cicatricial alopecias, the most frequent diagnosis was frontal fibrosing alopecia (33% of cicatricial alopecias), followed in order of frequency by lichen planopilaris (19%), fibrosing alopecia in a pattern distribution (18%), folliculitis decalvans (8%), discoid lupus (5.5%), and dissecting cellulitis (2%). Some specific types of alopecia were observed more frequently in women, others in men, with a predominance of central centrifugal cicatricial alopecia and traction alopecia in women of African origin, and dissecting cellulitis of the scalp and acne keloidalis in men of African origin. The proportion of patients under the age of 10 years was 2.4%. Among the pediatric hair conditions were in order of frequency: alopecia areata (39%), prepubertal pattern hair loss (24%), telogen effluvium (6%), hereditary hypotrichosis (6%), congenital triangular alopecia (4%), short anagen hair (4%), loose anagen hair (3%), trichotillomania (2%), and tinea capitis (1.4%). Conclusion: Knowledge of the main types of alopecia and of their epidemiological and clinical specifics are prerequisite for providing an understanding of the etiologies and appropriate patient care in a respective specialty clinic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.